Author Topic: Wizard Nebula HaSHO  (Read 2647 times)

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« on: 2017 July 17 15:50:28 »
Finally got the SII data--but only 3 subs!  It wil be cloudy for weeks now, so here is what I have.  I was surprised at how adequately 3 subs held up
TOA 130, SBIG STT-8300, 3nm Astrodon filters
11 30 min Ha
12 30 min OIII
3 30 min SII


Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #1 on: 2017 July 17 17:58:35 »
Very nice! Is what looks like dust really dark or is that just an artifact of processing?
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #2 on: 2017 July 17 18:25:58 »
Very nice! Is what looks like dust really dark or is that just an artifact of processing?
Thanks! There should be no processing artifacts.  I did not hit this too hard.  There is allot a faint nebulosity and dust in this region.  I did not set the black point too low in order to capture as much faint stuff as possible.
Rodd

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #3 on: 2017 July 17 18:32:15 »
I went back to a 9 year old image I took of the same nebula in RGB and see there really is quite a bit a dust in that area. Congrats on the great image! I will have to try this one in NB myself.
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #4 on: 2017 July 17 19:37:31 »
I went back to a 9 year old image I took of the same nebula in RGB and see there really is quite a bit a dust in that area. Congrats on the great image! I will have to try this one in NB myself.
  Thanks--I find NB SO much easier than RGB.  Primarily because my skies have  allot of light pollution and the seeing is never very good.  I love the structure that Ha reveals. 
Rodd

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #5 on: 2017 July 17 19:51:34 »
It was also my motivation to spend money on a mono camera and filters. Plus the challenge of learning new things.
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #6 on: 2017 July 17 20:24:11 »
It was also my motivation to spend money on a mono camera and filters. Plus the challenge of learning new things.
  You have the right hobby then....There are more learning curves in AP than there are stars in a globular cluster!
Rodd

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #7 on: 2017 July 19 09:34:49 »
I added 5 additional hours of SII. 


Offline RickS

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1298
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #8 on: 2017 July 19 16:27:29 »
Nice work, Rodd!

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #9 on: 2017 July 19 17:54:53 »
Nice work, Rodd!
  Thanks Rick.  I am honing in on a final image.  Here is a bit of star reduction and a less aggressive histogram.  I feel it is a stronger image.

Offline rdryfoos

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Wizard Nebula HaSHO
« Reply #10 on: 2017 July 22 07:48:41 »
Well--I had to reprocess this image.  I tend to create artifacts when I sharpen and use NC because I like detail and tend to overdo things.  I was much more careful than usual in this respect on this version.