Hello,
I have a Canon EOS 40D. Trying to load its RAW files into Pixinsight, I see the following problems: (Converter Settings used: VNG (smooth gradiants) and "Interpolate as 4 colors" (otherwise small artefacts visible))
- with default white balance settings of the RAW Loader, all images have a red base color - even in regions that should be black
- Use of "Camera White balance" in the Format Explorer does not help
- Use "Auto White Balance" does help, but everything is grey, even in regions that should be black.
I compared this to the results when I using Canon's Digital Professional to convert it to 16bit TIFF (linear contrast, no change to histogram), and then reading the result into Pixinsight:
- black is black (and not read)
- image appears to be even smoother
- visually, there is much more dynamic range, especially in the very bright parts of the picture.
- I tried to substatiate this observation by using the dynamic range script posted earlier in this forum. The results partially support the loss of dynamic range, but certainly not to the extent observed visually. See below.
Any ideas what is going wrong here?
Thanks,
Georg
Reading 1 file(s):
C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/IMG_0371.TIF
Reading TIFF: 16-bit integers, 3 channel(s), 3888x2592 pixels, chunky: 100%
run -x=auto C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/dynamic.js
Processing script file: C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/dynamic.js
Calculating effective dynamic range...
IMG_0371
Channel | Values | Bits |
--------|----------|-------|
0 | 15423 | 13.91 |
1 | 14479 | 13.82 |
2 | 15927 | 13.96 |
Reading 1 file(s):
C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/IMG_0371.CR2
Decoding Canon EOS 40D file (3944x2622 pixels, ISO=800, Exposure=1/64s): 100%
Loading raw image: 100%
run -x=auto C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/dynamic.js
Processing script file: C:/Users/Georg/Pictures/2007_12_24/dynamic.js
Calculating effective dynamic range...
IMG_03711
Channel | Values | Bits |
--------|----------|-------|
0 | 10941 | 13.42 |
1 | 14118 | 13.79 |
2 | 10282 | 13.33 |