Hi Nigel,
Sander has hit all the key points.
Quad or Eight-core is best (I am running the last of the pre-
i-x processors, and with Vista-64 Home on 8Gb RAM. My C-drive is only a 320Gb 7200rpm unit - although I might change things around soon, to make my C: and D: drives a 'striped RAID array' based on my two 1TB 7200 drives, and bring in a second pair of internal 1TB drives (mirrored this time) as 'internal backup')
My Graphics card is only 512Mb (although I do have a second 1Gb card to drive the two auxiliary monitors each side on the main 28" unit)
I don't know what the detailed specs are for your Dell proposal, but I did a LOT of searching at the time I upgraded, and found a simply EXCELLENT dealer here in the UK - who custom-built me a system that FAR exceeded anything else I could lay my hands on, and who have provided PERFECT service ever since (far exceeding the excellent service I have had from DELL in regards to my father's PC). You have my contact details, contact me off-group and I will pass these along (and that also goes for anyone else who may be interested, it seems 'better' to keep 'commercialism' out of out primary discussion interests here on the Forum).
I know that I designed this PC with PixInsight in mind, first and foremost - and only regret that I fixed my budget just as the new i-series processors were coming on-line. That said, I would have had to have waited a further month (at least) for an i-7 system to be built, and there would have been a 33% budget over-spend to have upgraded to a 6Gb i-7 system. But, it will soon be TWO YEARS since I purchased this system, and I certainly do NOT notice ANY 'bottlenecks' in performance, PI or otherwise. I have also been PERFECTLY HAPPY with Vista-64, just going to prove that, perhaps, most of the users who have experienced Vista problems may actually have themselves to blame, NOT their OS
.