fredvanner
Well-known member
Note: I'm not saying the registered HA frames are not registered - they definitely are registered. I'm saying that the HA integration is not an integration of the registered HA frames.
Would those be the reject frames?
I also noticed this error after channel combination. It did not cause the process to terminate maybe just a FYI?
ChannelCombination: Global context
Combining RGB channels: done
** Warning: Inconsistent Instrument:Filter:Name (FILTER keyword) value(s) - metadata not generated.
1.030 s
I'm not sure what you mean by "reject frames". If you mean the rejection map generated by ImageIntegration, then I would suggest that, with only two "real" frames to integrate you have no statistical basis for pixel rejection, so you should not enable pixel rejection.Would those be the reject frames?
ChannelCombination is trying to make one image from 3, and it's trying to preserve the metadata as best as possible. as you might expect, each input image has a different value for the fits keyword FILTER. since the new image is a 3-plane image, there's no one right FILTER attribute for it. so CC is telling you it couldn't come up with a FILTER keyword for the RGB image that made sense, and is not generating the FILTER fits keyword.
rob