pfilliatre1
Member
Hello everybody,
Since it is my first post in this forum, I begin by a little presentation. I am Philippe, from south-east of France, doing digital astrophotography for 15 years and using Pixinsight since 2018. Also, I wish to say a big "thank you" to all the Pixinsight team for this comprehensive software.
Now, I have an irritating little problem in my processing chain... I don't know if it is Pixinsight or Photoshop, screen calibration or other, that' why I post in this section.
When processing the images, I use AdobeRGB as the working space in Pixinsight, on Mac OS 10.14.5 with a Eizo screen, calibrated with a i1DisplayPro. Then I save the final result in TIF 16 bits for minor cosmetics in Photoshop CS5, which use the same working space. The image has the AdobeRGB profile embedded, and is displayed in PS exactly like in Pix. Now I convert in sRGB (relative colorimetry), then export in jpg : displayed in PS or Pix, the sRGB and AdobeRGB are very difficult to distinguish visually, as it should be. Now here is the problem: displayed in Safari, Aperçu, or Mail, the image in AdobeRGB is well displayed as in PS or Pix, but the image in sRGB looks quite different, with a noisier background. As sRGB images are intended to be shared on the internet, it is a concern. I really can't figure out where is the problem. Note that the problem also exists if I convert in sRGB with Pix ICCProfileTransformation.
Have you an idea ? For reference, here are the links to the same image, in AdobeRGB and after conversion. I would also be interested to know if other people can see a difference with their viewing tool (either Mac, Linux or Windows).
http://pfilliatre.free.fr/images/images_astronomie/ngc3227_20200224_v1_adobe.jpg
http://pfilliatre.free.fr/images/images_astronomie/ngc3227_20200224_v1_srgb.jpg
Thank you in advance,
Philippe
Since it is my first post in this forum, I begin by a little presentation. I am Philippe, from south-east of France, doing digital astrophotography for 15 years and using Pixinsight since 2018. Also, I wish to say a big "thank you" to all the Pixinsight team for this comprehensive software.
Now, I have an irritating little problem in my processing chain... I don't know if it is Pixinsight or Photoshop, screen calibration or other, that' why I post in this section.
When processing the images, I use AdobeRGB as the working space in Pixinsight, on Mac OS 10.14.5 with a Eizo screen, calibrated with a i1DisplayPro. Then I save the final result in TIF 16 bits for minor cosmetics in Photoshop CS5, which use the same working space. The image has the AdobeRGB profile embedded, and is displayed in PS exactly like in Pix. Now I convert in sRGB (relative colorimetry), then export in jpg : displayed in PS or Pix, the sRGB and AdobeRGB are very difficult to distinguish visually, as it should be. Now here is the problem: displayed in Safari, Aperçu, or Mail, the image in AdobeRGB is well displayed as in PS or Pix, but the image in sRGB looks quite different, with a noisier background. As sRGB images are intended to be shared on the internet, it is a concern. I really can't figure out where is the problem. Note that the problem also exists if I convert in sRGB with Pix ICCProfileTransformation.
Have you an idea ? For reference, here are the links to the same image, in AdobeRGB and after conversion. I would also be interested to know if other people can see a difference with their viewing tool (either Mac, Linux or Windows).
http://pfilliatre.free.fr/images/images_astronomie/ngc3227_20200224_v1_adobe.jpg
http://pfilliatre.free.fr/images/images_astronomie/ngc3227_20200224_v1_srgb.jpg
Thank you in advance,
Philippe