Hi!
I have had black spots showing up in the registered/debayered Ha subs after run WBPP 2.3.2. My data is dithered. Adding some pedestal helped, but re-running WBPP multiple time to test pedestals is time consuming.
The cause of the black dots is another issue I am investigating, but I found GESD in Image Integration is not rejecting these and some black spots are still showing up in the integrated image. I looked back and found that some at hot pixel locations, but others also showing up. This was not the typical narrowband being 'too close to zero' problem, because my 'average minimum' is .07, and 'average max' in the master dark was .056.
Windsorized Sigma Clipping gave superior results because I could set Clip Low Pixels to any value I want. .06 worked great for my data set, with .5% to 1% low rejections. Carefully comparing, even at 3:1zoom, the GESD to Windsorized rejection showed no visible difference excepting the black dots went away.
Suggestion: Add "Clip Low Pixels" to GESD.
Thks,
Roger
I have had black spots showing up in the registered/debayered Ha subs after run WBPP 2.3.2. My data is dithered. Adding some pedestal helped, but re-running WBPP multiple time to test pedestals is time consuming.
The cause of the black dots is another issue I am investigating, but I found GESD in Image Integration is not rejecting these and some black spots are still showing up in the integrated image. I looked back and found that some at hot pixel locations, but others also showing up. This was not the typical narrowband being 'too close to zero' problem, because my 'average minimum' is .07, and 'average max' in the master dark was .056.
Windsorized Sigma Clipping gave superior results because I could set Clip Low Pixels to any value I want. .06 worked great for my data set, with .5% to 1% low rejections. Carefully comparing, even at 3:1zoom, the GESD to Windsorized rejection showed no visible difference excepting the black dots went away.
Suggestion: Add "Clip Low Pixels" to GESD.
Thks,
Roger