Now that NormaliseScaleGradient v1.3 reads the NOISExx headers that are added by WBPP, ImageCalibration or Debayer, it should be OK to use NoramliseScaleGradient after MureDenoise. The NOISExx noise estimates are important in this case because it is necessary to base the image weights on the noise present before noise removal (for example, the noise present before running MureDenoise).2) Is it ok to use Mure after using NormaliseScaleGradient?
Now that NormaliseScaleGradient v1.3 reads the NOISExx headers that are added by WBPP, ImageCalibration or Debayer, it should be OK to use NoramliseScaleGradient after MureDenoise.
It might be worth doing a test to see if MureDenoise conserves the star flux. Run with and without MureDenoise. Check to see if the NSG calculated scale factors are similar for both runs. You can find the scale in the console output, and it is also recorded in the FITS header.
Regards, John Murphy
If 'Registration ==>Integration==>Mure' is OK, then 'Registration ==>NSG==>Integration==>Mure' will also be OK.Maybe the answer is the same but I need to run Registration ==>NSG==>Integration==>Mure in that order?