Perhaps you're correct. However, my experience says otherwise. See the attached for the results. NBRGB results are similar or the same for linear or non-linear But, for experiment's sake, here are the results with calibrated and combined RGB (color uncalibrated), calibrated Ha...no other processing at all.
Note that NARGB results are identical to the prior post (standard STF, RGB linked). Therefore, it seems to not matter whether or not the images are linear. The AIP processing is a mess. Maybe I did it wrong (even though it's pretty straightforward), but in either case, I'll stick with non-linear unless someone can demonstrate a superior method.
I'm on my way to collecting what will be in the neighborhood of 40 hours of ha and ~16 hours of RGB for a haRGB mosaic...I intend to learn the proper way to combine for the effect I'm looking for as in my last post. The idea is that my understanding of processing the combination will coalesce before I use all that time for this one project. Worst case I have a great ha mosaic.
If only I could treat the Ha as Lum to get all that detail...however, I don't believe the standard LRGB method will work using Ha as luminance (as has been amply documented in these forums). My understanding is that luminance effectively "lights up" and provides detail to the underlying RGB.
Much of the interesting nebulosity present in the M42 area is prominent in Ha, but does show up as much in RGB. So, there's effectively no RGB in many places for the ha to "light up". This is the understanding I've gained here. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I will post another experiment on LRGB with the same data which will attempt to demonstrate how well, or not LRGB works with Ha as L + RGB and Ha as L + R +G + B. I believe these provide very different results. That's my hypothesis which I believe has already been demonstrated here. Results to follow shortly...