Author Topic: Looking for simple video of full workflow  (Read 13455 times)

Offline jkmorse

  • PixInsight Padawan
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
  • Two questions, Mitch . .
    • Jim Morse Astronomy
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #15 on: 2014 February 12 19:10:32 »
PI Folk,

I have been updating with my Cribsheet and its now up to Rev18.  Here is the latest pdf version which includes improved formatting and organization as well as my latest learnings.   In the 18a version I have cut out the Tool Details at the end since they are available elsewhere and go deeper into theory than the Cribsheet is intended to cover (and to make it a more manageable size so it will fit in a Forum post).

As always, just drop me an email if you want this in Word format so you can tweak to heart's content. I am also happy to send along the Rev18 version with the Tool Details covering Masks, Dynamic PDF, ATWT Noise Reduction and Pixel Math.

Best,

Jim
Really, are clear skies, low wind and no moon that much to ask for? 

New Mexico Skies Observatory
Apogee Aspen 16803
Planewave CDK17 - Paramount MEII
Planewave IFR90 - Astrodon LRGB & NB filters
SkyX - MaximDL - ACP

http://www.jimmorse-astronomy.com
http://www.astrobin.com/users/JimMorse

Offline Mark de Regt

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 39
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #16 on: 2014 July 08 15:44:33 »
Well, I finally girded my loins (and have an unexpected stretch of free time), and started on Harry's videos.  And I already have a master that's better than what I could do with my old software (principally, I think, because PI seems to do registration of FSQ106 images much better).

I have an overwhelming amount to learn, but I'm finally gaining some optimism.

Thanks!

Offline sreilly

  • PixInsight Padawan
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
    • Imaging at Dogwood Ridge Observatory
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #17 on: 2014 July 12 09:32:22 »
Mark,

I think you'll find Harry's videos extremely useful and an excellent start. While I think the processing outlines will be helpful you will develop your own routines in time. Depending on the object and equipment used, FSQ vs RC, some routines may be needed on one that isn't on the other. One thing I see used a lot is noise reduction and suggest that it may not be needed depending on the amount of good data available to be used. If you only have say four 15 minute frames of red, green, and blue for your RGB image then likely it will be a bit noisy. On the other hand if you have 15-20 frames each you will find it much less noisy and likely not needing any reduction and able to process more aggressively.

One thing I have done since the beginning and continue to do today is name my images so I can see what I've done along the way. When I run a process on an image I save accordingly such as M57_101110_rgb_c_dbe_bn_cc_ms9.fit which tells me that I've got an rgb image that has been combined with 10 red, 11 green, and 10 blue images, cropped to eliminate the edges (dithered images), dbe has been applied, the background has been neutralized, color correction is applied, and I applied a masked stretch with a setting of 0.09 for the target background always with a preview of the starless background used for the background reference.

The point is during any image processing of any image I can go back see what was done and when. I can backup and choose anywhere along the line and change direction should I want. For that matter I may learn a new process skill such as using Local Histogram Equalization that I want to try after doing HDRMultiscaleTransform to bring back some brilliance into the image because it now look a bit flat , another one of Harry's Videos.

Depending on how you image you may want to align all your like binned images at one time. When I use the FSQ they are all binned 1x1 so why not align them all in the beginning. Now when you make your master color channels they are already aligned. When I use the RC color is usually binned 2x2 and luminance 1x1 so all color is aligned and save at the same time and then the luminance. When the LRGB image is made I use Dynamic Align to align the rgb with the luminance. I use the luminance as the reference image and the rgb as the 2nd image. This scales the rgb image up to the luminance image.

Anyway, that's just something additional to chew on. PI is a great program and always getting better. Much to learn but a good deal of help is just for the asking on this forum.

Steve
Steve
www.astral-imaging.com
AP1200
OGS 12.5" RC
Tak FSQ-106ED
ST10XME/CFW8/AO8
STL-11000M/FW8/AO-L
Pyxis 3" Rotator
Baader LRGBHa Filters
PixInsight/MaxIm/ACP/Registar/Mira AP/PS CS5

Offline tom886

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 11
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #18 on: 2014 July 15 18:50:17 »
I tried Warren's workshop and Harry's workshop.
Warren's slow speed makes me impatient  :-X , so I stay with Harry's page and collect information from here.

But basically you need time for processing.

Cheers
Tom

Offline CharlesW

  • PixInsight Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #19 on: 2014 July 16 07:37:17 »
If you own Warren's disks you can save the video files to your hard drive and then just increase the playback speed on what ever video viewer you use.

Offline tom886

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 11
Re: Looking for simple video of full workflow
« Reply #20 on: 2014 July 16 07:39:19 »
Thanks for the hint, but I don't owe them.
I watched some free videos on the website.

CS
Tom