Thank you Chris --
I looked over my flats and they varied quite a bit in brightness. In looking at the histogram only, the darkest were in the 30% range and the brightest around the 75% range. I was including all of them in my master flat.
I re-processed everything only including the 3 darkest flats. The results were much better -- see attached. This was with Bias, Darks, and 3 flats, auto-stretch.
Now, I also checked CFA in the batch process script and now I can't remember if I'm supposed to do that or not with DSLR_RAW files. I think some of my issues revolve around understanding the correct color settings to use. Under Format Explorer/DSLR_RAW prefs, I have it configured as in the screenshot below, but am uncertain of the true difference between "Create RAW Bayer Image" and "Create RAW Bayer CFA image" means, and whether or not we should/shouldn't use black point correction.
Also, one thing I noticed this time around -- when I opened the master flat, it opened as a greyscale image, as it should, I think. I noticed when I opened it earlier, after creating it manually, that it was color. I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it, but I thought it seemed strange my first image above had such a blue tint to it.
I might be wrong on this, too, but to clarify my own understanding: I didn't think the brightness of the flats mattered so much as long as the histogram was not clipped. I would think it's the uniformity/luminosity that is measured, not so much the brightness, to create a model of correction?
Thanks much, this is a fun learning experience
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32bc9/32bc91826f013f63c7c9cc080812298b3b64170a" alt="smile :)"