Author Topic: Dark Calibration Stopped Working?  (Read 3484 times)

Offline Al Fleming

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 3
Dark Calibration Stopped Working?
« on: 2012 August 01 04:26:22 »
What have I done? Tried calibrating my NB subs of NGC6960 but found that post calibration, there was the same amount of noise as before. Verified this by calibrating with and without Darks and got same noise distribution. Flats calibration worked OK. Don't know about the Bias calibration result. Until this point, PI calibration has worked perfectly. What error has the operator made this time? Thanks, Al

Offline Carlos Milovic

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2172
  • Join the dark side... we have cookies
    • http://www.astrophoto.cl
Re: Dark Calibration Stopped Working?
« Reply #1 on: 2012 August 01 09:03:14 »
Did you see any flags by ImageCalibration regarding the darks scalation? Maybe it showed a warning message saying that no correlation was found, and used a 0 valued scalation factor.
Regards,

Carlos Milovic F.
--------------------------------
PixInsight Project Developer
http://www.pixinsight.com

Offline Al Fleming

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 3
Re: Dark Calibration Stopped Working?
« Reply #2 on: 2012 August 02 03:05:31 »
Thank you for responding Carlos. Detail from the processing console: Dark scaling factors:

k0 = 0.254
* File already exists, writing to: C:/Users/Alistair/Astroimaging/NGC6960/NGC6960-005Ha_c_2.fit
Writing FITS image: 32-bit floating point, 1 channel(s), 3326x2504 pixels: 100%

===== ImageCalibration: 1 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 aborted, 0 skipped =====
2.917 s

Some more info: I had optimize ticked. If I don't tick it, I get a 'silverey' image. Regards, Al

Offline Al Fleming

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 3
Re: Dark Calibration Stopped Working?
« Reply #3 on: 2012 August 12 03:45:24 »
I've done more testing on this and remain confused. My darks and biases will still calibrate RGB or L subs, but they will not calibrate my narrowband subs. Why would this be, please? (I did not calibrate for Flats in either case to exclude possible errors in my master Flat generation.) Thanks, Al