Hi Carlos,
Thanks a lot for your nice words, and sorry for the delayed answer; I am very busy these days working on a new version of the Core application, bug fixes, new website, new projects, ...
I figured out what was going on....my system/ColorSync folder has all the icc profiles, but my user/ ColorSync folder was empty hence pixinsight had such limited options. I have transferred them to my user folder and now can pick them in pixinsight.
This is the correct procedure. PixInsight looks for ICC profiles on the following folders on Mac OS X:
/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
/Network/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
~/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
There is another folder, namely:
/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
that PixInsight does
not use. This limit has been imposed by design, based on Apple's official documentation:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn2035/_index.htmlOn the above document, jump to section "Profiles in Mac OS X". Excerpted from this section:
ColorSync profiles are primary stored here:
/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
If you are in a network environment, and your network administrator has stored profiles on the network for network devices, these can be stored in:
/Network/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
Lastly, users can store their own personal profiles in their home directory:
~/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/The same document also states:
There is a special location within the Mac OS X System folder for profiles:
/System/Library/ColorSync/Profiles/
This is where ColorSync stores profiles it uses internally for critical operations, should others be mistakenly lost or damaged.So in my opinion, this system folder should never be used by applications for ICC profile storage or retrieval, since it has been reserved for other critical system tasks. It seems that the other application you're using is storing some private profiles on this folder, which is a bad practice in my opinion. Unless somebody explains me how this reasoning is wrong, I won't change PixInsight's profile search strategy.
One question....what would be the preferred or recommended or even most common choices for the default RGB and Grayscale choice be? ....I currently have them set to adobeRGB and my proofing choice to sRGB since most of my images are for the web. Not sure if this is the best choice or are others recommended.
Adobe RGB(1998) is usually a good choice. It is a large gamut color space where you can take advantage of PixInsight's 32-bit processing capabilities. Other options include Apple RGB, ColorMatch, CIE RGB or even Adobe's Wide Gamut. With a wider space you can achieve more color saturation with less
stress of your data (in the numerical sense), and hence with less noise. However, bear in mind that when you convert your image to a smaller color space, such as sRGB or a printer's profile, you easily may get out-of-gamut colors, that is, colors that can't be reproduced by the output space or device. The need to reproduce your image on limited gamut devices is what actually limits you, irrespective of the size of your working color space. This is why color proofing is very important to control what your image will look like when you print it or deploy it to the web.
Another good option is working in the default sRGB space. sRGB is not so bad after all, and has the advantage that you get just what you can afford in a natural way
Even if working in the sRGB space, color proofing is necessary if you intend to print your image (you need your printer's ICC profile).
Hope this helps.