Hi Nigel,
Fundamentally, yes. If you at least save the HistoryExplorer contents as a ProcessContainer icon, you will save 'all' of the steps associated with the image.
However, you will not have saved any masks that were associated with any of the above steps, nor will you have saved any history associated with those masks.
I tend to find that I now save 'individual processes' which I take the time to suitable annotate, and name. I even hit <PrintScr> every so often as well, and then flip to a spare Workspace and <Ctrl-V> the ScreenCapture thus obtained as a new image, rename that, and save THAT snapshot as a 100%-quality JPG into my 'working folder' - so that I have a feel for 'how' I applied the processes, and in which order.
The bottom line is, in my mind anyway, that until such time as Juan implements a 'Save Project' facility, you really need to be very well organised if you are to have ANY chance of being able to recreate an IDENTICAL workflow. So, I just take my time, and save EVERYTHING (disk space is cheap nowadays) - which helps reinforce in my mind some of the stages that I find out about 'by experimenting'.
And, in any case, it is nice to be able to demonstrate how your beautiful image is extracted from what initially seems to be 'nothing'. Then, naturally, we need a PJSR that will take any pair of images and, on a pixel by pixel basis it will create a range of 'intermediate morphing images' (the number defined by the user) to show the transition from image A to B. Capture all of these morphs as BMPs, for each stage of your processing sequence, run them through something like 'bmp2avi.exe' or even Windoze Movie Maker. and you have a nice 'movie' of the birth of your new baby!!!
I would love to see that for some of our 'Gallery Stunners', with captions telling which process is being run as each Morph takes place.
Any takers?