Author Topic: Star Alignment take 2  (Read 9358 times)

Offline Emanuele

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 270
Re: Star Alignment take 2
« Reply #15 on: 2010 July 12 12:36:16 »
Hmm, alright, well so I basically need to calibrate in Maxim and bring the calibrated files into PI?
I should I save them in Maxim? IEEE Float?

Offline pfile

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Grand Master
  • ********
  • Posts: 4729
Re: Star Alignment take 2
« Reply #16 on: 2010 July 12 12:46:13 »
yes, there is a thread on this that i probably started. juan explained how to set up the fits reader to properly read in maxim DL f32 fits files. bottom line is that maxim is using the f32 format to store i16 data, so the range of values in the file are [0.0 - 65535.0] rather that [0.0 - 1.0] which is what pixinsight uses.

that's problem #1. fixing that makes your bias and darks work okay.

problem #2 is that the "dynamic range" (for lack of a better word) of the flats seems to be way too high. where the lights seem to want to be divided by 1.0 at the center to maybe 0.98 at the edges, the flat's illumination at the edges is much, much less and therefore when you divide the light by the flat the vignetting/dust is WAY over compensated.

i asked steve to send me a DVD with the flat subexposures under the theory that maxim DL must have done something very funny to the flats when integrating them... but he ignored me :(

Offline pfile

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Grand Master
  • ********
  • Posts: 4729
Re: Star Alignment take 2
« Reply #17 on: 2010 July 12 12:48:32 »
if you can save them as i16 in maxim that will probably yield the most compatible file...

Offline Emanuele

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 270
Re: Star Alignment take 2
« Reply #18 on: 2010 July 12 13:00:36 »
Wow, ok, thanks so much for your help. :)

I'll save the masters in i16 then and try again.