Author Topic: Sharpen module ?  (Read 4462 times)

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Sharpen module ?
« on: 2010 February 21 14:37:13 »
Hi,
The link to the sharpen module (32) seems broken :'(
I would like to give it a try.
Thanks in advance,

JG Moreau
Quebec

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #1 on: 2010 February 21 14:44:21 »
Which link?
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #2 on: 2010 February 21 16:34:26 »
Hello Sander,

Here is the Win32 compilation:
http://pteam.pixinsight.com/carlos/modules/Sharpen-pxm.zip

Jean Guy

Offline Niall Saunders

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Knight
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • We have cookies? Where ?
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #3 on: 2010 February 21 16:51:13 »
Hi Jean Guy,

Unfortunately PixInsight moved server recently, and some of the old links have been broken.

Hopefully Juan will pick up on this one, and may be able to 'fix it' - I am not even sure whether the links to some of my 'useful information' (stored on the PixInsight server) have made it through the changeover. Juan, can you check these for me?

Cheers,
Cheers,
Niall Saunders
Clinterty Observatories
Aberdeen, UK

Altair Astro GSO 10" f/8 Ritchey Chrétien CF OTA on EQ8 mount with homebrew 3D Balance and Pier
Moonfish ED80 APO & Celestron Omni XLT 120
QHY10 CCD & QHY5L-II Colour
9mm TS-OAG and Meade DSI-IIC

Offline Carlos Milovic

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2172
  • Join the dark side... we have cookies
    • http://www.astrophoto.cl
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #4 on: 2010 February 21 17:06:27 »
I have the feeling (almost, but not completely not sure... just joking, almost sure) that it was compiled with a "obsolote" PCL. Small changes in the low level code made it incompatible with current release of the core app. So, just wait until 1.6. It will use a different module system, that will quarantee full backards compatibility (from this release on...).
Bottom line... patience.
Regards,

Carlos Milovic F.
--------------------------------
PixInsight Project Developer
http://www.pixinsight.com

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #5 on: 2010 February 21 17:30:54 »
Ah, that's what it was about.
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #6 on: 2010 February 22 07:53:24 »
OK, waiting mode ON here, as with the weather :cheesy:

In the meanwhile, what is the best strategy to protect both the background and the stars
for deconvolution ?

Jean Guy

Offline Niall Saunders

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Knight
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • We have cookies? Where ?
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #7 on: 2010 February 22 08:16:06 »
Create a good StarMask, and add it (with PixelMath) to the first one or two Wavelet layers.

Or, start with a Lu channel extraction, and subtract the R layer from an appropriate Wavelet selection - leaving 'small scale' only (the 'R' wavelet layer having been adjusted to include only the largest 'nebulosity')

If you know anything about the Zone Processing System that Ron Wodaski recommends, then you are trying to confine different types of processing to different areas of your image (in a 2 x 2 'matrix' that has 'noise' on one axis and structure size' on the other).

So, at 'bottom left' you would have the dimmest AND smallest data. At 'top right' you would have brightest and largest data.

It seems to me that what you are trying to process is that section of the matrix representing ['biggest' but not quite 'noise free']. Were you interested in Stars alone, these would fall into the ['almost smallest' and 'noise free'] category, and the backgound itself would be ['smallest' and 'noisiest']

(and, in all of the above, substitute 'SNR' for 'noise' if you feel inclined to do so, but, in any case, read Ron's excellent book - he explains it FAR better than I can :))

Cheers,
Cheers,
Niall Saunders
Clinterty Observatories
Aberdeen, UK

Altair Astro GSO 10" f/8 Ritchey Chrétien CF OTA on EQ8 mount with homebrew 3D Balance and Pier
Moonfish ED80 APO & Celestron Omni XLT 120
QHY10 CCD & QHY5L-II Colour
9mm TS-OAG and Meade DSI-IIC

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Sharpen module ?
« Reply #8 on: 2010 February 22 18:11:31 »
Thank you Niall, the ability to create efficient masks is fundamental given the wide dynamic range of astro images.
Something i have to master. Your explanations will help set me on the right course.
Lots of fun experimenting anyway, thanks again,

Jean Guy Moreau