Found the reason for the implausible bias frames.
The ASI driver in the Linux/Raspi version of Indilib has default values for settings called WB_R and WB_B. Seem to be some white balance factors, running from 0 to 100, unity = 50. Default was WB_R = 52 and WB_B = 95. So I think the driver multiplied a RGGB gain vector (52, 50, 50, 95)/50 = (1.04, 1.00, 1.00, 1.90) to the pixels prior to saving it to the FITS file. Therefore, the blue pixels were overemphasised by a factor of 1.9, boosting them in intensity and made them clearly stand out of the noise floor of the bias frame. So it was not really the Bayer pattern that could be seen in my image but the positions of the blue pixels in the CFA because they were almost twice as bright as the rest.
I corrected the values of WB_R and WB_B to 50, respectively, and took another bias frame. And voilá, it looks as it should.
CS, Bernd