Okay, thanks for the update.
I have lunar images and some of Jupiter and even some stellar/DSOs that I've graded by "hand." The reason I have these is that I sometimes do high-resolution work a little differently than most. I capture using an APS-C camera in STILL mode (not video) and take anywhere from 48 to 64 individual, sixteen-megapixel stills and then visually inspect those to find the best given the seeing and other factors. I generally concentrate only on a relatively small area of interest (craterlet or rille on the moon, cloud detail in Jupiter, double star, etc.) and typically reject anywhere from one third to one half of the candidates (depending upon the seeing, which generally must be pretty good or why else bother?). On the lunar images, if it is obvious that only a small portion of the image is sharp then I will reject the sub even if it looks good in the primary area of interest.
After that process I run the images though either Registax or AutoStakkert!2 and then sharpen in either Registax (wavelets) or PixInsight (deconvolution).
Honestly, however, for planetary images video is best because you obviously need hundreds if not thousands of "good" frames to get the maximum detail possible and I would never be able to grade that many images by simple visual inspection (other than to do a quick, gross inspection to reject the very worst images). Thus, when capturing with my dedicated planetary camera (video) I almost always allow Registrax or AutoStakkert! to do the automatic selection.
However, for lunar images I think the situation can be a little different since I can cover much larger fields with an APS-C camera than I can with the typical one or two megapixel planetary camera. That's really the major reason why I've continued with this technique (i.e. stills rather that video), because I like the wide field of coverage I can get with the APS-C sensor when I image the moon (rather than having to do a multi-framing montage to cover that same area with a small-sensor camera).
I'd be willing to provide you with some sets of images on the moon. However, unless your tool can easily handle four megapixel or larger images then my workflow probably wouldn't benefit much from what I can currently do with either Registax or AutoStakkert!. The problem with those tools is that they can't handle large images which to some degree has limited what I can do with my APS-C sized frames.
Let me know if I can help in any way, as I'd absolutely love to have a tool that could handle the grading and integration of really large (greater than 4 megapixel) lunar images.
Here are some links to two lunar shots that I've done using stills from my APS-C camera (single framing, not a montage, these are large images so make certain you either zoom or look at the full-size version, not just the default view in Flickr):
https://flic.kr/p/pf7Trc https://flic.kr/p/qhrn3w 
