Author Topic: PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners  (Read 2861 times)

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners
« on: 2014 December 07 06:41:39 »
Hi,
I thought the following experiments I did with a new Windows 8.1 PC might be of general interest. In essence they show that
- Switching Windows from Balanced to High Performance mode has no influence on speed
- Switching PI priority from Time Critical to normal has no influence on speed
- Creating multiple swap files on a single SSD gives a nice performance boost
- Adding a virus scanner (ESET)  considerably slows down the system

Note that I dont recommend running Windows without virus scanner. If the system is connected to the internet, a virus scanner is mandatory!

Below a summary of the results, the details can be found in http://pixinsight.com/benchmark/
Georg

Benchmark Serial NumberTotalCPUSwapTransfer (MiB/s)Total time(s)Remark
2R9VD69O55T40BRQ30921ALUDV1II4J6527966792833511.4689.11Baseline with fresh Windows and PI with defaults
TSF2T9N3V4QUMNQUU6165LT71446I38M590467403908705.5279.67 plus multiple swap files
6Q74TKAW6R803MRFV73XDSEO76A14VM2548662043714670.6185.75plus virus scanner
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline vicent_peris

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Padawan
  • ****
  • Posts: 988
    • http://www.astrofoto.es/
Re: PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners
« Reply #1 on: 2014 December 07 08:17:56 »
Hi Georg,

Very interesting. Regarding the multi-threaded swapping, it also helps a lot in my laptop system. As I'm running in Linux, usually single-threaded swapping running in RAM gives me around 2 GB/s. If I select 4 threads in the same folder (/tmp), it rises to 3 GB/s.

Have you experimented by putting different number of threads? It's good to find how many threads perform better with your system.


Best regards,
Vicent.

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
Re: PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners
« Reply #2 on: 2014 December 07 10:24:43 »
No, I did not yet do any systematic tests with different numbers of swap files. Anyone interested in doing this?
Georg
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline NGC7789

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Re: PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners
« Reply #3 on: 2014 December 07 10:57:12 »
I have done this. On my system (i7 4770k running Ubuntu) my best swap performance came from two threads each for two swap sources (ram disk and SSD). I've tried more threads (3 and 4 per source) as well as uneven (3 ram disk 2 ssd and vice versa). All performed worse. I wonder if it has something to do with the number threads being equal to the number of cores.

-Josh

Offline jkmorse

  • PixInsight Padawan
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
  • Two questions, Mitch . .
    • Jim Morse Astronomy
Re: PI Performance, SSD, Virus scanners
« Reply #4 on: 2014 December 08 09:50:16 »
I am running on Windows 8.1 as well.  I saw my biggest boost with my new SSD when I went to six swap files (set up in an empty 128Gb partition).  Significant improvement over four.  Also tried 8 but that degraded performance.  My laptop has an i7 core so its definitely not a match between number of cores and swap files, at least on my machine.  In any event Georg, its worth playing around with this aspect.

For what its worth.

Jim
Really, are clear skies, low wind and no moon that much to ask for? 

New Mexico Skies Observatory
Apogee Aspen 16803
Planewave CDK17 - Paramount MEII
Planewave IFR90 - Astrodon LRGB & NB filters
SkyX - MaximDL - ACP

http://www.jimmorse-astronomy.com
http://www.astrobin.com/users/JimMorse