Hi Juan,
thank you very much for your detailed answer. It worked as it should :-), even if my problem was not solved.
My fault was, I thought DBE didn't work well on my image and it creates colour gradients. In fact the casts are already in the image and with DBE they just became more visible, because the background is more flat
![embarassed :-[](http://pixinsight.com/forum/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
.
Now I solved my problem by generating more samples (50 instead of 15 per row). In most cases fewer samples worked better for me, but in this case I had to create really much of it.
The third picture is with 50 samples per row and I am very lucky with it
![smile :)](http://pixinsight.com/forum/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Do you have an idea, where these gradients (in first image) came from? Of course the pictures are wiiiiiide stretched to visualize the casts.
colour gradients
![](http://www.tracking-station.de/zeigl/integration.JPG)
DBE with 15 spr
![](http://www.tracking-station.de/zeigl/DBE15.JPG)
DBE with 50 spr
![](http://www.tracking-station.de/zeigl/DBE50.JPG)
I like the DBE very much and I am very exciting for the new version
![smile :)](http://pixinsight.com/forum/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
. As you asked for something that can be better: If you do a boosted STF while DBE, the samples became invisible. I think the boosted STF would be very helpful while selecting the samples.
normal STF:
![](http://www.tracking-station.de/zeigl/DBESTFn.JPG)
boosted STF:
![](http://www.tracking-station.de/zeigl/DBESTFboosted.JPG)
Greetings
Tobias