Author Topic: Ghost Nebula  (Read 6120 times)

Offline Howard

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 67
    • Cabin in the Sky Observatory
Ghost Nebula
« on: 2011 October 18 23:43:11 »
Hi:

Here's a rendition of the Ghost Nebula, resulting from approximately 15 hours total in LRGB, with thanks for any comments and suggestions (details and attachment follow).

Processing was done entirely with PixInsight, except for use of CCDInspector to evaluate subexposures and to monitor overall specs during processing.
 
Here's to deep draws from dark skies 8)!
Howard.

Image capture details
Telescope: PlaneWave CDK17, with a focal reducer at f/4.5.
Mount: Paramount ME.
Camera: SBIG STL-4020M.
Exposures: Approximately 6 hours luminance unbinned, and 3 hours in each of red, green, and blue with 2x2 binning; 10 minute subexposures in all channels.
Flat field correction: using twilight flats.
Image capture: TheSkyX, MaxIm DL, FocusMax.
Image scales: Unbinned pixel size 0.78", frame about 25' on a side.
Imaged between August 6 and 26 2011 from rural British Columbia, Canada.

PixInsight processsing highlights
LUMINANCE:
Deconvolution (reduced Aspect ratio and nonzero Rotation to correct for guiding problems on gusty nights) ; ATrous (star masked, positive bias on layers 3 and 4 to increase contrast on extended nebula structures); UnsharpMask (applied to brightest core region of nebula); ACDNR (luminance mask).
CHROMINANCE:
RGB BackgroundNeutralization; LRGBCombine (Saturation=0.15); CurvesTransformation (mild additional saturation boost);  Histograms (colour balance and black point); MorphologicalTransformation (2-way Morphological Selection to circularize and erode small stars).



Obsessed with the photographic experience of the cosmos!
Cabin in the Sky Observatory: PlaneWave CDK17, Paramount ME, Apogee U16M, Astrodon filters & MOAG, Starlight Lodestar, in a roll-off roof under the deep, dark skies of rural BC Canada.

Offline Cyclop_si

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 8
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #1 on: 2011 October 19 02:38:17 »
Woowww, great image!

Offline Lex

  • PixInsight Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 555
  • We do it at night...
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #2 on: 2011 October 19 14:18:15 »
Hi,

Nothing elso to say than, WOW!!

Best!
Clear Skies!!

Lex

______________________________________

AZEQ6 GT, TS UNC 10" f5, ASI1600mm-c

HADSO (Hagen Deep Sky Observatory)20 km W of Luxemburg City

Offline Jules

  • PixInsight Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 513
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #3 on: 2011 October 21 08:44:12 »
Lovely image Howard.

All the best Julian

Offline Howard

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 67
    • Cabin in the Sky Observatory
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #4 on: 2011 October 22 07:27:40 »
Hi Cyclop_si, Lex, and Julian:

Thank you for your encouragement :)!

Best regards,
Howard.
Obsessed with the photographic experience of the cosmos!
Cabin in the Sky Observatory: PlaneWave CDK17, Paramount ME, Apogee U16M, Astrodon filters & MOAG, Starlight Lodestar, in a roll-off roof under the deep, dark skies of rural BC Canada.

Offline jeffweiss9

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #5 on: 2011 November 03 19:47:13 »
That is amazingly good.
-Jeff
APM LZOS 130/780 f/6 LW CNC II APO, Riccardi 1.0 FF or 0.75 FF/FR, Tak EM-200 Temma2, FLI Microline ML-16200, Astrodon E Gen 2 filters and 5nm Ha, Orion 50mm Guider & Starlight Xpress Lodestar X2.

Offline jtalbot

  • PixInsight Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 78
    • http://www.starscapeimaging.com
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #6 on: 2011 November 10 12:33:26 »
Howard,

Amazing image of the Ghost.  This is one of the best I've seen yet.

Jon
Clear Skies

Jon

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #7 on: 2011 November 11 07:57:05 »
Very nice image Howard !

"MorphologicalTransformation (2-way Morphological Selection to circularize and erode small stars)."

Can you explain how you do this please ?

JG Moreau


Offline Howard

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 67
    • Cabin in the Sky Observatory
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #8 on: 2011 November 20 02:19:30 »
Hi Jeff, Jon, and JG:

Thank you very much for your kind appreciation, and my regrets on taking so long to reply.

JG, the approach that I used to circularize and erode the stars is due to Carlos Milovic, as described in the following posts:

http://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=500.15
http://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=2975.msg20394#msg20394

I needed to circularize the stars in this image because many of the frames were taken on very gusty nights, which played havoc with guiding along the RA. This resulted in stars with a noticeably elliptical shape that was closely aligned with one axis of the frame.

To correct for this, I tried to follow Carlos' recommendations as detailed in the above posts. A major ingredient is to use the MorphologicalTransformation (MT) with Operator=Morphological Selection, and with two or more "ways" for the Structuring Element, where these are designed to achieve the desired effect. In my case, I used two ways: a line of white squares along the direction of the long axis of the ellipse, to make the stars rounder, followed a square to reduce the overall size of the stars (the small stars were the major problem, so I used 3x3 elements, along with an appropriate star mask). Carlos recommends to use a small Amount with multiple Iterations, and to use a mild Selection of around 0.2 to achieve a gradual erosion. I used Amount=0.05, Iterations=5, and Selection=0.2, and I applied the whole MT operation 5 times. I arrived at these settings after a lot of experimentation.

Rogelio Bernal Andreo has an excellent description of all the parameters in the MT in his "Officially Unofficial" PixInsight reference guide:

http://blog.deepskycolors.com/PixInsight/Morphology.html#MorphologicalTransformation

I started the processing with a Deconvolution that had a moderately aggressive aspect ratio of 0.75, with a slight rotation to align with the long axis of the ellipse. I might have been a bit unorthodox here, as I first tried to "objectively" measure the aspect ratio using the DynamicPSF tool, but I found that I needed a rather smaller aspect ratio to achieve a good result. I applied the MorphologicalTransformation in the nonlinear phase of the processing, in fact near the very end of the whole workflow.

I hope this is helpful.

Cheers,
Howard.
Obsessed with the photographic experience of the cosmos!
Cabin in the Sky Observatory: PlaneWave CDK17, Paramount ME, Apogee U16M, Astrodon filters & MOAG, Starlight Lodestar, in a roll-off roof under the deep, dark skies of rural BC Canada.

Offline JGMoreau

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Ghost Nebula
« Reply #9 on: 2011 November 21 12:45:27 »
Hello Howard,
Thanks very much for the detailed explanation. I will experiment along these lines.
I have a F/2.5 Newt. so star shape is always an issue ::)

Jean Guy in Quebec