Author Topic: Alignment of Drift Images  (Read 6489 times)

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
Alignment of Drift Images
« on: 2009 December 27 09:18:42 »
Hi,

I tried the following experiment:
- Take 180 shots of 30 seconds each every 60 seconds with the 35mm kit lens that comes with my Canon EOS40D
- Align them via Star Alignment Process
- Stack than via Image Integration Process

The result of the stack is always something like the (particularly bad) example attached below: The center of the picture is reasonably good, the outer regions are distorted. The image shown is a stack of 10 pictures only. The single shots only show the usual 30 second drift lines in stars, not the strange explosion pattern seen in the integration image. I guess the reason for this is a combination of the following:
- the Canon lens is not free of distortions
- I am trying to stack plane representations of a sphere surface, which is obviously somewhat difficult (note that this is not an issue with the usual small fields that you get with 500mm+ lenses. The field of a 35mm lens is much larger.)
- When using Star Generator as a reference, I probably have to cope with the peculiarities of map projections.

I tried to resolve this as follows:
- Use Canon's DPP program to reduce lens distortion. Partially helped.
- Use Star Generator to create a map, use Dynamic Alignment to map one picture to this star map, use the resulting transformation to "un-distort" all images, align them, stack them (the result is what you see below)
- Use Star Alignment with increased RANSAC Tolerance (max value is 4) and/or 2-D spline surfaces. No real improvement compared to the plain stack, the reason probably being the fact that Star Alignment finds matched stars only in a small vertical stripe that gets smaller as the difference between reference and target image becomes greater.

Nothing really helped. I wonder if anyone out there has an idea how to handle the problem.

Enjoy your holidays!,

Georg
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline dhalliday

  • PixInsight Old Hand
  • ****
  • Posts: 307
    • on Flickr
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #1 on: 2010 January 05 03:54:34 »
Wow...maybe this is the big bang ??  ;D
are these exposures tracked?

Seriously,I think this must be lens distortion...(mostly)
Can we see what 1 single image looks like?
Why not try a stacking program like Deep Sky Stacker...?
I have stacked 50mm shots with no problem using it;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/daveh56/3915511013/in/photostream/

Dave
Dave Halliday
8" Newtonian/Vixen VC200L/ TV 101,etc etc
SSAG/EQ6
CGE Pro
SBIG ST2K,ST10XME

Offline Niall Saunders

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Knight
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • We have cookies? Where ?
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #2 on: 2010 January 05 04:20:29 »
Hi Georg,

What about trying this approach . . .

Determine your FOV when using the Canon + 35mm lens - you already have some images to work from

Use something like Cartes du Ciel to create a star map covering that same FOV. Create the image without any Equatorial or Alt-Az gridlines, and without any ID labels. Take a screenshot and transfer that image into PI for use with the Dynamic Alignment process.

I think that the problem is 'associated' with the very wide FOV of the 35mm lens - but perhaps only so because the Star Generator process was put together for much a smaller FOV, one without the spherical 'distortion' needed to match your wide-angle lens.

I have only suggested CdC because I remember that it can handle different projection types, user-controllable depending on the overall FOV of the image.

Let me know if you think this helped.

Cheers,
Cheers,
Niall Saunders
Clinterty Observatories
Aberdeen, UK

Altair Astro GSO 10" f/8 Ritchey Chrétien CF OTA on EQ8 mount with homebrew 3D Balance and Pier
Moonfish ED80 APO & Celestron Omni XLT 120
QHY10 CCD & QHY5L-II Colour
9mm TS-OAG and Meade DSI-IIC

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #3 on: 2010 January 05 18:06:28 »
Hi Niall,

good idea. I think I will give it a try. Any idea which kind of projection would be most suitable for this?

Thanks,
Georg
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline Niall Saunders

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Knight
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • We have cookies? Where ?
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #4 on: 2010 January 06 02:42:03 »
Hi Georg,

No - I know that there is quite a large selection of choices, each confined to a certain FOV. I seem to remember that there was 'Help' information in CdC.

I don't have time to experiment for you at the moment.

Cheers,
« Last Edit: 2010 January 06 09:01:37 by Niall Saunders »
Cheers,
Niall Saunders
Clinterty Observatories
Aberdeen, UK

Altair Astro GSO 10" f/8 Ritchey Chrétien CF OTA on EQ8 mount with homebrew 3D Balance and Pier
Moonfish ED80 APO & Celestron Omni XLT 120
QHY10 CCD & QHY5L-II Colour
9mm TS-OAG and Meade DSI-IIC

Offline Cheyenne

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
    • Link to Picasa gallery of my astronomy photos
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #5 on: 2010 January 06 07:14:34 »
You might want to try the FFT alignment script.  From what I understand, the FFT registration algorithm can handle some distortion between the images (in fact it was my search of the FFT registration process that initially led me to PixInsight).
Cheyenne Wills
Takahashi 130 TOA
Losmandy G11
SBIG STF8300M
Canon 20Da
SBIG ST-i + openPHD for autoguiding

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Alignment of Drift Images
« Reply #6 on: 2010 January 17 07:58:20 »
Juan,

researching this issue a bit, I found that the task of projecting the sky to a plane image is a formidable task. It can either be conformal (preserve angles) or isometric (preserve area), but not both (for those interested, use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection as a starting point). I also played a little bit with Stellarium http://www.stellarium.org/, which allows to modify the projection in its options dialog. You can clearly see how lines bend when you move across the sky...

Regarding the Star Alignment process, I was wondering if it uses the triangle angles or the triangle sidelengths for matching 2 images.  I was not quite sure even after reading your explanations in http://173.205.125.124/forum/index.php?topic=874.0. Is the projection chosen by Star Generator (most likely Lambert Conformal Conic projection, (RA, Dec) center:(289.042201648, 1.3255246231) degrees) the right one for the kind of "drift mosaic" that I am trying to do?

Your advice is welcome.

Georg

Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)