If you step back and think about what each variable is reporting, than it should be apparent whether a larger or smaller value is better. For instance, FWHM is a measure of star size. Tighter stars indicate better seeing conditions, so smaller is better. Number of stars is likely positively correlated with seeing: more stars = better seeing.
In fact, most of the measurements are correlated, either positively or negatively, with seeing/imaging conditions (equal exposures, moon position, zenith distance, ...). In fact, if you just set the image weight proportional to the number of stars, you'd probably be well off.
Alex