Here some screen shots, will upload some step by step later.
The original image after registering and stacking, with the registered DSS image (had no time to cover all of my image
), with an histogram transform and saturated to see the "good" background I have:
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/4879/comparaoriginal.jpgIn each of the following images is a comparative of the DSS image downloaded and registered and my image after making the DBE correction, all with the same histogram transformation and saturation:
With DBE calculated in automatic mode over a stretched and saturated image, then applied to the base image:
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/7571/comparaautoi.jpgWith DBE calculated in manual mode over a stretched and saturated image, then applied to the base image:
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6749/comparamanual.jpgWith DBE applied in manual mode over the dss image and more samples in the original image:
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/861/comparadss.jpgSome thoughts:
Last weekend, when I first posted this, I used the dss image as a mask to put the samples in DBE model, but today I change to put the samples in the dss image, throw DBE icon to workspace, open it again over my image. Will be a improvement to make this easy, to have the STF independently between the image and the mask. What I try to explain is that will be nice if you can apply the STF over the base image and/or over the mask to improve viewing the mask over the image.
I'm sure I'll have better results if the dss image covers all my image, there are still some artificial gradients
Sergio