Author Topic: BatchPreProcessing vs single Integration Steps  (Read 2273 times)

Offline frasax

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 39
BatchPreProcessing vs single Integration Steps
« on: 2017 January 29 15:42:05 »
Hi there,

i´m looking for the best ImageIntegration Process for my monochrome CCD Images. So, the BatchPreProcessing Script is very handy an so. But are there advantages to go through the single Processing Steps? What would you look for, or do you have any recommendations to yield the best results?

I´ve used a professionell Software for years, but i´m frustrated because of its sensitivity. I´m looking for a way to yield the best SNR, best FWHM and superior Background extraction and resampling.

CS Frank


Offline Geoff

  • PixInsight Padawan
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
Re: BatchPreProcessing vs single Integration Steps
« Reply #1 on: 2017 January 29 16:52:09 »
Look at the article entitled "Image Integration Techniques" on this page http://www.astrosurf.com/jordigallego/articles.html
A bit dated but clear principles enunciated.
Don't panic! (Douglas Adams)
Astrobin page at http://www.astrobin.com/users/Geoff/
Webpage (under construction) http://geoffsastro.smugmug.com/

Offline frasax

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 39
Re: BatchPreProcessing vs single Integration Steps
« Reply #2 on: 2017 January 31 09:55:55 »
Hi Geoff,

i had this paper already, but not studied yet.
Thank You
Frank