Author Topic: Changing FWHM on Image Integration  (Read 2485 times)

Offline pvelez

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 30
Changing FWHM on Image Integration
« on: 2016 September 24 23:10:32 »
I've noticed of late that many of my RGB images have a green or aqua halo around stars, particularly brighter stars.

Applying the FWHM Eccentricity Script to the Masters, I see that the FWHM of the files differ - with G the largest and R the smallest. Now the odd part of all this is that the subs that I integrated had a reasonably consistent FWHM across all filters - as assessed with the Subframe Selector script.  Perhaps I am misunderstanding the FWHM parameter. However I am surprised that I have bloating in G and to a lesser extent in B using the same integration settings.

Am I missing something?

Pete

Offline msmythers

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
    • astrobin
Re: Changing FWHM on Image Integration
« Reply #1 on: 2016 September 24 23:36:11 »
Pete

Do you have local LP? That and high haze can cause this. I have to blink all my subs because I live in a year round, very hazy coastal area. Here is an example from blink with a wide field shot.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B13r3kYqTf8NajRFR1VPTVVZT2c/view?usp=sharing You can see Rigel and the other stars change as the haze moves. This was over a 36 minute period.


Mike

Offline pvelez

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 30
Re: Changing FWHM on Image Integration
« Reply #2 on: 2016 September 24 23:52:00 »
Mike

I'm imaging from the iTelescope facility which is on the SSO site at Coonabarabran in NSW, Australia. Its a research site and very dark. So its not LP. I agree that there might be some high cloud or haze about - but I doubt that is contributing to the issue.

I have a suspicion it is a feature of the Image Integration process. To give you a concrete example, - I just ran the Subframe Selector script on 29 frames taken in G - the highest FWHM I accepted for the Master was 3.298. I then combined them with Image Integration using Winsorized Clipping. Checking the resulting Master with FWHM Eccentricity script, I see that the median FWHM is 4.321. So for some reason in the integration process, my FWHM has jumped up by 1 pixel.

Ahhhh - just twigged - rookie error. I had Subframe Selector displaying in arc seconds not pixels. Change that and it all makes sense. My maximum FWHM in the subs was actually 4.71 pixels. The Image Integration process brought that down to 4.321. D'oh! My bad.

I'll leave this post as I've typed it as a warning to others to check the units!

Pete

Offline msmythers

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
    • astrobin
Re: Changing FWHM on Image Integration
« Reply #3 on: 2016 September 24 23:58:46 »
These things happen. 8)


Mike

Offline pvelez

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 30
Re: Changing FWHM on Image Integration
« Reply #4 on: 2016 September 25 00:06:23 »
They certainly do Mike

A Homer Simpson emoticon is called for here!

Pete