Author Topic: Noise reduction of galaxy itself?  (Read 2681 times)

Offline mstriebeck

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
Noise reduction of galaxy itself?
« on: 2014 May 18 02:16:16 »
Hi,

I tried to use Juan Conejero's tutorial on noise reduction and deconvolution (http://pixinsight.com/examples/M81M82). Overall, I am pretty happy with the results.

Before: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71789253/Lum_cropped_CBR_ABE.fit
After: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71789253/Lum_final.fit

I also wrote up my steps here: http://mstriebeck-astrophotography.blogspot.com/2014/05/a-different-approach-to-process.html

One thing that is noticeable is that the galaxy itself is a little "grainy". Should I attempt to reduce the noise in the galaxy itself? And if yes, at which point and how? All my attempts so far resulted in loss of detail

Thanks
      MarkS

Offline JoLo

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 46
Re: Noise reduction of galaxy itself?
« Reply #1 on: 2014 May 21 12:10:34 »
Sorry, I had trouble opening up your images.

The short answer is yes, carefully reducing noise in the galaxy is desirable, especially in the fainter signal of spiral arms.

I have had good success using a careful stepwise approach to NR.  I use MMT on the linear state of both Lum and RGB images...very carefully, with a good stretched luminance mask in place.  I generally concentrate on layers 1 and 2 at this point and keep StdDev and Iterations low.  There may be some noise left (which you want) but does a good job of smoothing the background and, depending on your mask, some of the fainter signal that will have noise.

Toward the end of the workflow, after stretching and enhancements, I typically do a two step process with MMT and ACDNR...MMT on layers 1-3 and ACDNR for larger scales.  I use an appropriate mask for each, including a strong RangeSelection mask on those dimmer, hard to reach signal areas.

Like with most things PI, trial and error, trial and error, trial and error.......

I find this slow, stepwise NR helps control the noise in the areas you speak of, without putting too much on the background till it takes on that "waxy" appearance.  You can always save the NR image separate and use PixelMath to blend it with the original, in case the NR is too much.

Joe
Orion Atlas
AT106
AT65
Canon 450D
Atik 314L+

Orion 12" Dob

Offline Astrocava

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
    • Astrocava.com
Re: Noise reduction of galaxy itself?
« Reply #2 on: 2014 May 21 12:49:52 »
Hi!

I haven't downloaded your images, but I've read your blog post to follow your process. I think is better to use the MMT noise reduction before convolution. Give it a try. ;)

Have fun!

Sergio
Moonfish ED80 over a Meade LX200GPS 8"