Author Topic: Sub denoiser?  (Read 2704 times)

Offline mschuster

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1087
Sub denoiser?
« on: 2012 December 16 22:48:03 »
Sometimes I capture one sub to survey an area, or to double check target framing. The result is noisy. So I have been wondering if it would be possible to quickly denoise a single sub. Here is the result of one scheme. Input is one calibrated sub and values for sensor gain and read noise. Output is the denoised sub. No user input required (i.e. no masking or anything else needed) it runs automatically. What do you think? Would anyone use something like this? I am thinking this might be scriptable.

Thanks,
Mike
« Last Edit: 2013 March 26 13:01:03 by mschuster »

Offline Philip de Louraille

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 289
Re: Sub denoiser?
« Reply #1 on: 2012 December 17 06:43:23 »
I'd say this is useful.
Philip de Louraille

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Sub denoiser?
« Reply #2 on: 2012 December 17 11:19:12 »
Useful. But how is this different from other denoising algorithms? How does the result differ from first stacking images? My impression is that denoising subs is much harder than denoising stacked images because of the lower SNR.
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline mschuster

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1087
Re: Sub denoiser?
« Reply #3 on: 2012 December 17 11:43:35 »
Georg, sorry for the confusion. I am thinking of the case where I have nothing to stack, only one subframe. And I wonder if I can get a clearer view of the target even so. The price is a loss of resolution, which of course stacking avoids. It seems to me that whenever I denoise I loose resolution. It's like a law of nature or something. On what's different from other techniques, to me it seems easy to use, no masking, no tweaking parameters and also well matched to detector characteristics.

Thanks,
Mike
« Last Edit: 2013 March 26 13:01:15 by mschuster »