« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: CloneStamp softness=0 is not "hard"  (Read 2795 times)

Offline georg.viehoever

  • PTeam Member
  • PixInsight Jedi Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2132
CloneStamp softness=0 is not "hard"
« on: 2012 April 12 08:44:09 »
In my opinion, with softness=0 the clonestamp pattern should be a circle without aliased pixels. This however is not the case, see screenshot, visualization of circle on the top right. This behaviour requires to use Radius=1 when fixing problematic stars for GradientMergeMosaic, see http://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=4105.msg28797#msg28797 .
Georg
Logged
Georg (6 inch Newton, unmodified Canon EOS40D+80D, unguided EQ5 mount)

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: CloneStamp softness=0 is not "hard"
« Reply #1 on: 2012 April 12 08:46:00 »
Agreed.
Logged
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity
Pages: [1]
« previous next »