Author Topic: subtle processing rings  (Read 8149 times)

Offline Nocturnal

  • PixInsight Jedi Council Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2727
    • http://www.carpephoton.com
Re: subtle processing rings
« Reply #15 on: 2011 June 29 14:23:20 »
Cleon,

looks like you have significant drift from sub to sub. I imagine PI reports on the image shifts but I don't know for sure. I use this technique:

http://deepskystacker.wikispaces.com/Measuring+differential+flexure

In any case, with enough subs and sigma type stacking you should be able to reduce at least the appearance of the hot pixel streaks. If your drift isn't enough to make the hot pixels stand out enough for sigma stacking to eliminate them you could add dithering to your capture process. I generally recommend getting differential flexure under control first but under some conditions it can help improve image quality because it randomizes the streaks, making them less obvious.
Best,

    Sander
---
Edge HD 1100
QHY-8 for imaging, IMG0H mono for guiding, video cameras for occulations
ASI224, QHY5L-IIc
HyperStar3
WO-M110ED+FR-III/TRF-2008
Takahashi EM-400
PIxInsight, DeepSkyStacker, PHD, Nebulosity

Offline Cleon_Wells

  • PixInsight Addict
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: subtle processing rings
« Reply #16 on: 2011 June 29 17:43:40 »
Sander, thanks for the link, I'll try to tighten up the guide scope/mounting tonight and see if anything changes. The total time for the 43 subs = 107.5 min, with 2 min per sub with .5 minutes between the subs. Here's and image of my setup with a lot of places for flexure.
Cleon
Cleon - GSO 10"RC/Canon T1i-Hap Mod, 100mmF6/2Ucam/MG, EQG/EQmod