PixInsight Forum (historical)

PixInsight => General => Topic started by: robyx on 2019 November 05 00:22:09

Title: Misalignment between SubframeSelector script and process
Post by: robyx on 2019 November 05 00:22:09

Hi all,

yesterday on a FB discussion it has been noticed that the weighting and acceptance formulas adopt different naming conventions on min/max measurement values (like FWHM minimum or maximum) between the SubframeSelector process and SubframeSelector script.

In the process you have to use FWHMMin, FWHMMax, EccentricityMin, EccentricityMax etc... while in the script you have to use FWHMMinimum, FWHMMaximum, EccentricityMinimum, EccentricityMaximum etc...

Being called with the same name I would expect them to adopt the same conventions and to digest the same formulas, which actually is not the case.

Attached you can find the two tooltips reporting the different naming convention.


Best regards,
Robyx

Title: Re: Misalignment between SubframeSelector script and process
Post by: pfile on 2019 November 05 07:59:23

these two tools were written by different people, both PI users, which accounts for the difference.

either Cameron or Mike would have to fix their respective tools to conform to the other or Juan would have to break the tie by making the changes himself.

rob

Title: Re: Misalignment between SubframeSelector script and process
Post by: robyx on 2019 November 05 08:02:37

I see, thanks a lot for the information, my intention was indeed to help the reconciliation between the two.

Robyx